At our last general meeting, GSD heard from Sommer Omar of the Coalition to Save the Public Recreation Center Downtown, and voted to co-sign the letter to elected officials below.
The City’s announced plan to demolish the Tony Dap — without any commitment to maintain a recreation center at that location, or preserve the Keith Haring mural at the public pool — is in direct opposition to promises made since 2019 that the facility would be repaired and re-opened for public use.
Grand Street Democrats encourages voters in New York City to leave Andrew Cuomo off their ranked choice ballots in the Democratic primary for NYC Mayor.
Former Governor Andrew Cuomo entered the mayoral race hoping that New Yorkers don’t recall why he resigned in 2021. But we remember:
Andrew Cuomo resigned as governor after a thorough investigation by the Office of the Attorney General found he sexually harassed and retaliated against at least 11 women, including government employees.
According to the U.S. Department of Justice, Andrew Cuomo and his senior staff discriminated against female government employees in violation of Title VII by subjecting them to, and tolerating, a sexually hostile work environment created by Cuomo for eight years.
A 2024 House Select Committee held Andrew Cuomo publicly accountable for his involvement in issuing the disastrous March 25 Directive — which forced nursing homes to accept COVID-19 positive patients — and publicly exposed his efforts to cover-up the tragic aftermath of his Administration’s deadly decision.
New York City’s ranked choice voting system for primaries lets voters select up to five candidates for Mayor on June 24. Ranking Andrew Cuomo anywhere on your ballot (even last!) means that there’s a chance your vote will count for him. To make sure Andrew Cuomo does not win the Democratic primary, remember: Don’t rank Andrew Cuomo on June 24.
Grand Street Democrats supports NYC Bill 1096-2024, which will protect the vested health insurance and contributions of retired employees of the City of New York.
In 2021, New York City announced that it would stop paying for Medicare supplemental insurance for all retired municipal employees, including teachers, sanitation workers, police officers, and firefighters.
In place of getting direct payments through Medicare, retirees would instead be enrolled in a private insurance plan called Medicare Advantage. Unlike Medicare supplemental insurance, Medicare Advantage plans limit access to certain doctors, regularly deny coverage for recommended care, and feature rising deductibles that retirees would have to pay out of pocket.
In response, municipal retirees banded together and sued the City to protect their right to maintain the quality of healthcare they had been promised over decades of contractual negotiations.
Retirees have won those lawsuits, over and over again, including ten favorable State Supreme Court decisions and two unanimous Appeals Court decisions in the State of New York.
Nevertheless, the City of New York under Mayor Eric Adams persists in its plan to force retired city workers off of Medicare and onto privately-managed Medicare Advantage plans.
Over the past 40 years, municipal employees have frequently accepted lower salaries in difficult contract negotiations in exchange for the promise of security in retirement through pensions and health insurance.
Reneging on that promise now is a breach of contract. If enacted, Bill 1096-2024 would commit the City to honor its obligations to retirees and continue to give them the option of Medicare supplemental insurance.
Grand Street Democrats urges all elected officials to publicly support this proposed legislation in order to maintain municipal retirees’ promised health insurance options, consistent with contractual and statutory obligations.
Update: This amendment passed by a vote of members on 11/18/24.
At our 11/18/24 Annual Meeting, voting members will be asked to approve a change to our bylaws that would make a member of the Democratic State Committee who is also a member of Grand Street Dems with voting privileges ex officio a member of GSD’s Executive Committee.
From the start of the club, we have had the same accommodation for District Leaders. This is the first time we have had a State Committee member who is also a member of the club, so members of the Executive Committee proposed to extend that rule.
Below is the section of the bylaws in question, with the proposed amendment highlighted:
Article 6, Section 1
Membership in the Executive Committee shall consist of the Officers and current District Leaders and State Committee members who are members of this Club with voting privileges.
The demolition of the Manhattan Detention Center (aka The Tombs) is imminent — to make way for an $8.3 billion borough-based jail project across four boroughs. To the best of our knowledge, $8.3 billion is only for the buildings to be built by 2028 and not for services needed now by the inmates and those who work on Rikers Island.
In the interest of time, the Executive Committee drafted the letter below to be sent to Mayor Eric Adams for his attention via email, postal mail, social media, and this video:
Please help circulate this message.
We will vote on this as a club resolution at the next GSD meeting on March 21st.
Thank you for your attention.
Sincerely,
The Executive Committee of Grand Street Democrats Marion Riedel, President Sandra Strother-Ribeiro, Vice President Julie Huang, Vice President Melissa Shiffman, Secretary Kenny Wind, Treasurer Lee Berman, District Leader Caroline Laskow, District Leader
In a reply to a Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) request, NYC’s Department of Design and Construction (DDC) stated that the City’s Value Engineering Study on the East Side Coastal Resiliency (ESCR) plan could not be sent because:
“DDC’s search of agency records revealed no responsive documents for [the FOIL] request.”
This means that the present massive $1.45 billion plan lacks the main justification for the change that doubled the cost and destruction.
According to a “Fact Sheet” from de Blasio’s office on Sept. 28, 2018, “The adoption of the new design follows a value engineering study performed earlier this year and a review of the project by a panel of experts with experience from around the nation.”
When an independent analyst from the Dutch firm, Deltares, hired by Manhattan Borough President Gale Brewer, reviewed the present ESCR plan (Alternative 4) in 2019, he also requested this Value Engineering Report: “The ‘value engineering report’ leads to the conclusion that Alternative 4 can be completed faster and with a greater degree of certainty,” he wrote. However, he never saw the document. “This value engineering report is not publicly available,” he noted.
The Value Engineering Report was used by the City as justification for approving a plan that would:
completely raze the 46 acre East River Park;
kill approximately 1000 mature trees and all other vegetation in the 82-year-old park;
add a million tons of landfill over 1.2 miles of waterfront;
double the initial cost of the project plan; and
postpone even temporary flood protection for years.
If there is no Value Engineering Report, then there is no justification for the approved plan.
There has been a sustained outcry from community members and over 14,000 signers of petitions opposing the plan, including 2,000 NYCHA residents, who will be disproportionately affected. Advocates call for flood control that will not completely destroy the park as well as interim flood protection and robust alternate park spaces during the years of construction.
Due to this latest news, we demand the city suspend the ESCR project until it can be reviewed in full, including all documents used to support the conclusions in the City’s final environmental impact statement, by a panel of independent experts.
This position should be communicated to the Mayor and all City, State, and Federal elected officials who represent Grand Street Democrats.
With a City Council vote imminent on the East Side Coastal Resiliency Project — the plan to add 8-10 feet of land fill to East River Park for flood protection from Montgomery to 23rd Street — Grand Street Dems voted at our fall meeting to recommend that our Council representatives vote “No” on the ULURP application.
How our representatives — Carlina Rivera and Margaret Chin — vote may determine how the entire City Council votes, since on most ULURP votes Council members defer to the wishes of the local representative.
Thank you to the organizing done over the past several months by East River Alliance and East River Park Action, including several GSD members, to shed light on the many problems with the City’s plan.
At our fall meeting on October 16, Grand Street Dems members voted to recommend “Yes” votes for all five City Charter revision proposals that will be on the ballot in November.
We were fortunate to have three members of City Council with us to give us the Charter revision highlights — Ben Kallos, Mark Levine, and Brad Lander.
Councilmembers Ben Kallos, Mark Levine, and Brad Lander speaking at GSD Fall Meeting.
There will be five revisions to the City Charter that need voter approval in November:
Changes to NYC elections, including introducing ranked choice voting for primaries and special elections.
Reforms to the Civilian Complaint Review Board that adjudicates alleged misconduct by NYPD officers.
Changes to ethics and governance statutes.
Modifications to City budgeting, including allowing a rainy-day fund for the first time.
Additional transparency to approving land use changes (ULURP).
There are a few very useful documents you can find online:
Grand Street Democrats supports New York State Committee Members in their efforts to move the deadline for Democratic party registration for voters to 25 days before any primary.
Resolution adopted May 16, 2019
Update: One of our State Committee Members, Chris Marte, let us know this morning that he will be voting for the “Let All Democrats Vote Amendment” at today’s State Committee meeting. He sent us a fuller explanation of the rules change, which is included below:
This amendment would change the “Primary Participation” section (Part Two, Section A, 2) of the NYSDC 2020 Delegate Selection Plan and would guarantee that all New York voters who apply to join the Democratic Party at least 25 days before the 2020 Presidential Primary get to vote in that Primary. As currently written, this section states that participation in the Presidential Primary will be limited to New York voters who have enrolled in the Democratic Party by October 11, 2019, which is over six months in advance of the Presidential Primary, and the longest waiting period in the entire nation.
It is critical that we pass this amendment for several reasons:
The “Primary Participation” section of our delegate selection plan does not meet the requirement that State Parties are to do everything in their power to guarantee a change of party enrollment deadline no earlier than the voter registration deadline of 25 days in New York.
DNC Rule 2, Section J requires State Parties to ensure “an open and inclusive process” in the selection of convention delegates by “revising State Party rules and encouraging administrative rules, legislation, or considering litigation to… allow voters to switch parties at least as late as the deadline for registering to vote.”
DNC Rule 2, Section C requires State Parties to take “all feasible steps” to eliminate excessively long waiting periods for voters to change their enrollment status, including revising Party rules.
If the State Committee does not amend its delegate plan and fix this problem, it could cost NY delegates and money.
DNC Rule 21, Section C(6) states that the DNC may take action against State Parties that have “failed or refused to comply” with the DNC rules by reducing the size of the NY Delegation to the National Convention, diminishing the voice of New York Democrats in the nomination process.
DNC Rule 22, Section C gives the DNC the power to force non-complying State Parties to pay for a private selection of delegates, which could cost the party millions of dollars.
The “Let All Democrats Vote Amendment” not only brings New York in compliance with the DNC, but also meets the national average time required to change Party enrollment and matches New York’s new-voter enrollment deadline (of 25 days before the Primary). For the 2020 Presidential Election, it is critical that we pass this amendment and not miss the opportunity to capitalize on the energy of the Primary to build Party enrollment and to demonstrate the Party’s commitment to fundamental democratic values and fairness.
The East Side Coastal Resiliency (ESCR) Project is “designed to reduce the risk of floods from coastal storm surges and/or flooding from high-intensity rainfall events.” (The full draft environmental impact statement prepared by the City is available here.)
The City’s $1.4 billion proposal would bulldoze three miles of shoreline parks from Montgomery to 25th St., add landfill, and raise the entire park 8-10 feet as a flood wall against the East River. Construction would start in March 2020 and last 3½ years, by the City’s estimate. Nearly seven years after Superstorm Sandy, the City has no plan for flood protection before the project is complete.
The City’s plan is problematic and needs to be reconsidered.
The environmental impact of the construction project would be devastating, with all existing trees and other plant life destroyed and the loss of significant park components such as the Seal Park and the FDR-era amphitheater.
Construction will close more than 60 acres of parkland along the East River without any plan to replace this vital recreation space during the time of construction.
The City’s track record with large-scale construction projects, in particular those at East River Park, offer no assurances that construction (and loss of park use) will last only 3½ years.
The City has provided no independent engineering review of the necessity of its proposed plan or comparative feasibility of other plans.
After years of delay from the City, residents are now rushed to approve this plan based on an upcoming deadline of initial funding from the Federal government.
Nearly seven years after Sandy, the City still has no plan for immediate flood protection.
We recommend the following:
Commit to any East River Park construction in stages so that parts of the park are kept open and usable for the duration of the project.
Work immediately with our Congressional representatives to extend the deadline to spend Federal funds, and delay the approval of this project, so that the ESCR review process is not rushed.
Convene an independent panel of engineering specialists to review the City’s current plan and proposed alternatives like East River Alliance’s recommendation to extend the park over the FDR Drive. Expert panels have either reviewed or been proposed for large-scale construction projects on the L Train, BQE, and East Side Connector; the Lower East Side deserves the same consideration.
Provide immediate flood protection, even if short-term. There are many types of deployable barriers that could be used to protect the Lower East Side from storm surges while a long-term solution is thoroughly explored.
Commit to other plans to mitigate the impact of loss of park access, including providing transportation to alternate fields, investing in playgrounds and parks in the neighborhoods adjacent to East River Park, and designating alternate protected bike lanes as part of the East River Greenway.
Preserve and repurpose existing historical and landscape components of the park.